This is the website of Abulsme Noibatno Itramne, also known as Sam Minter. In addition to the blog below, be sure to check out the other sections of the site above and to the left! IM me on AIM as Abulsme or email me at abulsme@abulsme.com. Comments are always appreciated! Thanks!

 

If you came here from a link on another site, chances are high you are looking for the Electoral College Prediction page.

Wed 30 Jul 2003

Osama Update and History

This is a nice recap of the search for Bin Laden over the last few years (going back to the Clinton years). A reminder that despite the recent obsession over Iraq, this is still around.

The Search for Osama by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker

"He's sending tapes and messages to his followers all the time, with instructions that could not have come from anyone else," Yossef Bodansky, the director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, told me recently. "They're things like condolences to families of Islamic luminaries who have died," he said. "People from the Philippines to Indonesia to South America ask bin Laden questions, and they get answers from him." Bodansky was struck by the meditative tone of the letters. "They are written with a tremendous amount of peace of mind. There are no mistakes. He is not a guy on the run."

(found via CounterSpin)

There isn't too much brand new here that we have not heard before, but it is a good compilation. Sooner or later, our distraction with Iraq is going to cause us more problems.


Abulsme - Wed, 30 Jul 2003, 14:54:41 PDT - News
Permalink and Comments [1 comments]

Giving Up on Enterprise-Wide Integration? Good!!

Giving Up on Enterprise-Wide Integration by Erika Morphy of newsfactor.com via Yahoo News

"Point-to-point integration is an excuse many companies use for their broader IT strategies," he added. "Companies need to wake up and smell the EAI coffee; all those hand-built connectors cannot ever scale, over time, the way an application layer can."

That from Lois Columbus at AMR research.

I used to be a big fan of fully thought out integrated solutions. They make "more sense" from a logical point of view, they are more scalable. They are more flexible. All those sorts of wonderful things. But after spending seven years at a company in the top 50 largest in the contry, more than ever I am convinced this is a counterproductive approach except in unusual situations.

The thing about integrated approaches is that to pay off you need time and money to do them right, and then they need time to grow and take root and start to bear fruit. This almost never happens.

By the time an integrated approach can be planned and implemented, the needs and priorities of the organization often have morphed unrecognizably. In the process of being built the integrated solution will have been compromized in order to meet time and budget goals. It will not be flexible enough to change to the new environment. Not to mention the fact that technology will have moved forward, already making the solution obsolete.

Now, perhaps some of this perception is specific to where I work and to my specific experiences over the past few years. Probably. Many people would probably tell me I am dead wrong and their experiences are completely opposite. OK. But I suspect that many of the underlying factors are widespread. There are certainly cases where large scale enterprise wide technical solutions are needed, and there is no other choice. In many more cases I'm convinced that need is just a phantom need. It sells software for the big vendors of integrated systems. Nothing more.

Yes, the spaghetti-like nature of just patching together systems as needed and making short term tactical projects to meet the immediate need done does not usually scale well, or provide a long lasting foundation that you can build on for decades.

But guess what? In most cases, it DOES NOT NEED TO. You solve the specific problem at hand, and move on. Yes, some of these "temporary" solutions end up living forever, but if they work, who cares? In most cases, the whole system will end up being revamped in favor of new technologies within a few years anyway, and/or the business needs for even the existance of the project at all will evaoporate.

So while the "Enterprise" quality solution would still be poking along trying to be planned and built, with ruggedness to survive for longer than it will ever be useful, the "quick and dirty" solution could already be operational and providing results now.

So yes... if you have a very stable organization, working on very stable systems and processes, and have a very long time horizon, and expect what is being built to last a very long time, and won't mind operating on obsolete technology five years on, and have lots of time and money to burn... go ahead with the big fully integrated solutions.

But if, like most of us, you need to get results quickly, and live in a world where business needs and priorities change at least once a year, if not more frequently, then beware of the big solutions. They will suck time and money and effort and most likely result in less than what you wanted. If you can get a quick and dirty that isn't TOO dirty, then go for it. You'll get the results you need faster.

And yes, EXPECT to replace it every couple of years with something new and EXPECT to spend some time troubleshooting and figuring out the spaghetti later. But guess what, you'll probably still end up spending less than the fully integrated mega-solutions.

The area where I've seen this the most is in content management, which has been my area for the last seven years or so. Perhaps I'll have some thoughts specific to that area later.


Abulsme - Wed, 30 Jul 2003, 10:46:06 PDT - Tech
Permalink and Comments [0 comments]

Cat

My Tivo caught a bunch of episodes last month of the TechTV show "Call for Help" because they were having a series on Photoshop Tricks which was caught by my "Photo*" season pass. Anyway, the cohost is Cat Schwartz who is lots of fun. The show is good, and Leo gives good information, but Cat is who makes the show interesting. I tried to bring up her blog at the time, but it was down and I forgot about it.

But yesterday on Fark they linked to one of those voting contests with her and some other woman, and that link (forget where it was now) mentioned that she had accidentally posted topless pics of herself to her blog. Woops. They are gone now (although they can be found googling elsewhere), but her reactions to it are funny and well tempered. So here is a link to her blog. Cat is cool. :-)

Cat Schwartz's Blog

I'll write more later and give ya another pic. One with my shirt on.

Sounds good. I'll have to check in more often. And perhaps add a wishlist for the show itself, so I get it times when they aren't doing something on Photos as well.

Now, if only Stephanie Birkitt, one of Dave Letterman's assistants on the Late Show would get her own blog too. That would be cool. Both of these women deserve their own shows. :-)

And I will try to avoid accidentally post revealing pictures of myself here as well. Not that anybody would want to see that. :-)


Abulsme - Wed, 30 Jul 2003, 08:45:10 PDT - Fun
Permalink and Comments [0 comments]
PREV page NEXT page


MEMBERS

July 2003 >
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

ABULWIKI

AbulWiki Home
Sam Geneology
Amy Geneology
Recent Changes
Random Wiki Page
Electoral College Prediction

OLD STUFF

True Binary Clock
Al/Kim Wedding
Pets and People
Home Movies
Old Pictures
Old Graphs
Volleyball
Resume
Fitness
Books

ARCHIVES

August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003

ARCHIVE SUMMARY

View by Date

View by Category

Advanced search

PEOPLE WHO EMAIL ME A LOT AND HAVE WEBSITES

Al Michael
Ron Adams
Robert Pavia
Chris Morrow
William Minter
Brandy Donaghy
Greg Haverkamp
Rebecca Livingston

SITES I READ A LOT

Boing Boing Gadgets
Talking Points Memo
Huffington Post
DemConWatch
The Daily Dish
Boing Boing
Instapundit
Neatorama
The Corner
Facebook
Engadget
Daily Kos
Seattlest
Gizmodo
Yglesias
TUAW
Digg
Fark
Slog
io9
Listed on BlogShares Powered by pMachine XML

STATS

Total entries: 2517
Total comments: 1898
Total members: 39