This is the website of Abulsme Noibatno Itramne (also known as Sam Minter). Posts here are rare these days. For current stuff, follow me on Mastodon

Categories

Calendar

May 2026
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

A Little Here, A Little There

Two more superdelegates for Clinton.

Two more superdelegates for Obama.

Unforced Error

We’ve talked a bit on Curmudgeon’s Corner about how given the math, Hillary’s main path to a victory centers around just waiting around and hoping Obama stumbles and falls. This thing yesterday is exactly the kind of thing that should have both Hillary and McCain jumping up and down with glee.

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest … they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

— Barack Obama, 6 Apr 2008

Note the “…” of course. This is a small bit of a much larger statement. And in context what he says makes sense as part of a larger semi-academic analysis of why certain voters tend to prefer to vote on “values issues” even when it appears to go against their direct economic interests. Of course, even with the FULL CONTEXT the statement will rub a lot of people the wrong way, and offend many others. Let alone when you take just the little bit above with no context what so ever. People are already having a field day with it.

And guess which people are the most likely to have issues with this sort of statement? Well, of course those on the right that would never consider Obama anyway, but also those independants or center-right democrats that might consider an Obama, but right now are pretty uncertain about him. Many of those folks may be Hillary voters right now, or if they were not on Thursday, they are now. And guess what, there are a bunch of these kind of voters in some states, like say… Pennsylvania!

You know, I’m starting to get Ron Paul flashbacks here. I mean, I know part of the appeal is being straightforward and saying what you really think without being overly political or pulling punches or doing that say what the audience wants to hear thing… but there is certainly a time to just SHUT THE HELL UP and not say things that will get your opponants all riled up and push the folks on the fence AWAY from you.

Sigh.

Anyway, one good set of comments on this whole hoopla is here:

Obama’s “Gaffe:” Some Perspective
(Mark Ambinder, The Atlantic)

There is some truth to this. Even John McCain has expressed a similar sentiment about immigration politics.

But the perilous words for Obama are “bitter,” “cling to,” “guns” and “religion.” Those disinclined to put themselves in Obama’s head will read the sentences and see Obama dismissing both religion and American gun culture the opiates of the masses and suggesting that their faith and lifestyle are the product of their bitterness. Voters may believe that one’s position on cultural issues is a better reflection of their inner values than one’s position on economics.

The elite media and most Democrats will say… “yeah.. .So? Obama is simply describing world as we know it.” His opponents and people who are inclined to view Obama as an elitist will say, “he is dismissing the culture and religion of working class whites.”

Despite his working class upbringing, Obama’s hyperconfidence sometimes translates as holier-than-thou, elitist, aristocratic, Dukakis-esque. Republicans know that these attributes aren’t popular in middle America, so they will use every opportunity to remind independents and moderates about them.

There are tons of comments around on these comments and their potential effects, this is one of the first I saw that seemed to give somewhat of a real analysis rather than just “Gotcha!” posts from the right side of the blogosphere. :-) Of course, I’ve been doing some other things, so I’m about 23 hours behind in Google Reader right now, so I’m sure a ton more has been said by now. :-)

Oh yeah, to be clear, I don’t think this one thing is a campaign killer or anything. It is recoverable. It is just the sort of shooting yourself in the foot that is completely unnecessary. And several of these in a row could be a big problem. But Obama SHOULD be able to recover from this one. But he has been “catching up” in PA, and this may stop that trend.

(Edit on 13 Apr 2008: Corrected the date of the Obama quote from the 11th to the 6th. It happened earlier, just didn’t hit the blogosphere until the 11th.)

Electoral College: McCain gains strength in Ohio

Really more an Obama weakening than a McCain strengthening, but regardless the end result is that with the latest updates, Ohio moves from “Leans McCain” to “Weak McCain” as McCain’s lead in the state grows to over 5%.

In terms of my summary, this makes Obama’s “best case” not quite as good as before, as Obama winning Ohio is no longer in the range of “quite possible” outcomes given current polling.

The last “good news” Obama had in terms of this state by state polling was back on March 26th. Since then everything has been good for McCain.

Current Summary:

McCain Best Case – McCain 340, Obama 198
Obama Best Case – Obama 342, McCain 196

And if everybody gets their leans (and Obama gets DC) – McCain 283, Obama 255

Electoral College: Obama loses strength in New York

A new poll in New York drops my average for that state from “Strong Obama” to “Weak Obama”. The actual new poll is interesting as it actually shows McCain ahead. In a state that showed a strong Obama lead in previous polls, this is not something Obama will be happy about. The extended primary campaign *is* hurting Obama in the general election contest.

Also interesting is that this poll also gave a seperate question when hypothetical VPs were included. McCain adding Rice as a VP added 1 point to his poll results. Obama adding Clinton as a VP dropped his poll results by 2 points.

Anyway, since NY is still “weak” and hasn’t dropped all the way to “lean”, it doesn’t affect the summary, but I will repeat it anyway.

Current Summary:

McCain Best Case – McCain 340, Obama 198
Obama Best Case – Obama 362, McCain 176

And if everybody gets their leans (and Obama gets DC) – McCain 283, Obama 255

Potato(e)

Bring the potato to the fore,
It follows me and bothers me
and brings it to the milk.

See, They are Fine

Curmudgeon’s Corner: The Eyebrow Caucus

Sam, Amy and Ivan talk about:

  • The Eyebrow Incident
  • New iPhones Coming?
  • Smartphone Comparison
  • Obama Exposed
  • Obama’s Demographic Issues
  • Assassination Fears
  • Legislative District Caucus
  • Enviroweenies
  • Caucus till you Drop

1-Click Subscribe in iTunes

View in iTunes

Podcast XML Feed

Late Curmudgeon

Ivan and I recorded our show a few hours later than usual, then I had a few other things to do, so the podcast isn’t edited and posted yet. I’ll have it out before another 24 hours go by though. Promise.

Obama Weakens in Iowa

A new poll drops Obama’s Iowa lead in my 5 poll average to under 10%, which moves Iowa from “Strong Obama” to “Weak Obama”. In my “range of possible outcomes” that I do, this doesn’t make a difference, as I only allow the “Leaning” states (less than 5% lead) to move back and forth, not the “Weak” states (lead between 5% and 10%). But it certainly is a sign that things in Iowa aren’t going in a direction Obama would like.

Current Summary:

McCain Best Case – McCain 340, Obama 198
Obama Best Case – Obama 362, McCain 176

And if everybody gets their leans (and Obama gets DC) – McCain 283, Obama 255

Thirteen and a Half Hours

It finally ended thirteen and a half hours after it started. I am home now. But I am tired, so I won’t post anything more about it here. I expect I may have a few words to say about it in the next episode of Curmudgeon’s Corner though. (Which should be out in the next 24 hours or so.)