This is the website of Abulsme Noibatno Itramne (also known as Sam Minter). Posts here are rare these days. For current stuff, follow me on Mastodon

Categories

Calendar

July 2026
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Live Tweeting my Local Washington State Republican Caucuses

I am planning today to go to the Republican Caucuses here in Washington state. Doors open in about 30 minutes, you have to be signed in about 60 minutes from now, and 90 minutes from now the “action” should get started.

Assuming I am able to, I will be live tweeting as things progress. The tweets will appear on abulsme.com at a few minutes before 00:00 UTC in daily summary form, or you can follow me on Twitter to get updates in real time:

@abulsme

If I understand correctly, there will be a straw poll vote (which will be what is reported first by the press, but doest really matter), then there will be speeches and such, and then delegates will be picked for the county conventions. Those delegates will state their preferences most likely, but will not be bound in any way at the next level. Washington has 40 delegates, 30 will be winner take all 3 at a time by congressional district, and 10 will be proportional based on the state wide vote.

For the record, I plan on expressing my preferences (I hesitate to call what happens at a caucus actual voting) for Ron Paul. Of the four remaining Republican candidates, he is my preference by far. In terms of caucus participation, I am a Republican for the day, but at this point I am not ready to commit to what I will do in November. We shall see. And there will likely be other choices besides the Republican and Democrat, some of which may be interesting.

Electoral College: Montana back to Strong Romney

Map from the Abulsme.com 2012 Electoral College Prediction page. This map reflects Obama vs Romney. If any other candidate takes the lead in the Republican delegate race we’ll switch to making maps for them.

For a short time Romney’s last five poll average had dropped to less than a 10% lead in Montana, but the latest poll pushes that average back over 10%, so we color the state bright red again. Since either way Montana is not close to being a swing state (although the margin was only 2.3% in the 2008 election!) this does’t effect the overall summary of the race.

Romney Obama
Romney Best Case 291 247
Current Status 210 328
Obama Best Case 159 379

This does represent the first state to move in Romney’s direction in a couple of weeks, which can be seen in our trend chart:

Chart from the Abulsme.com 2012 Electoral College Prediction page.

@abulsme Updates from 2012-03-02 (UTC)

  • Reading – Michigan delegate drama (Mark Murray and John Bailey) http://t.co/zP60ttvy #
  • Reading – Santorum Spokesman: Romney Engaging In 'Backroom Dealing Political Thuggery' In Michigan (Benjy Sarlin) http://t.co/XJ188JL8 #
  • Reading – Santorum’s Super Headache: Why His Best Super Tuesday Outcome Might Be Stalemate (Sabayo, Kondik, Skelley) http://t.co/Kg2EOgJ4 #

Electoral College: Tennessee Swings and Wisconsin Solidifies for Obama

Map from the Abulsme.com 2012 Electoral College Prediction page. This map reflects Obama vs Romney. If any other candidate takes the lead in the Republican delegate race we’ll switch to making maps for them.

New polls in our last five poll averages move Obama’s lead in Wisconsin to over 10%, so that state moves into the “Strong Obama” category.

More interestingly perhaps, Romney’s lead in Tennessee drops to under 5%, moving that state to the “Lean Romney” category, which for purposes of our “best case” scenarios, puts the state into play for Obama. In 2008 McCain won Tennessee by a 15% margin, so this is somewhat surprising. We’ll see if this holds up as we move further into the year, but for the moment, that is where we are.

New Summary:

Romney Obama
Romney Best Case 291 247
Current Status 210 328
Obama Best Case 159 379

And the trends since the beginning of the year…

Chart from the Abulsme.com 2012 Electoral College Prediction page.

Up is better for Obama, so you can see that at least so far, things have generally been heading in his direction. It is of course still very early, so much will change between now and November.

Correction 2012 May 23 10:18 UTC: As it turns out, Wisconsin should NOT have flipped from Weak Obama to Strong Obama with this update on March 2nd. This change was influenced by the presence of a Washington State poll that I incorrectly included in my Wisconsin data. When this is backed out, Wisconsin does eventually go Strong Obama, but not until March 30th. Thanks to Darryl at HorsesAss for finding the error in my spreadsheet. The time series chart is corrected to reflect this starting with my May 23rd update.

Correction 2012 Jun 8 14:56 UTC: So, Tennessee shouldn’t have moved on this day either. The HorsesAss data included an old Tennessee poll from October 2011, that shows a strong Romney lead. The presence of this poll would have delayed the Tennessee move to “Lean Romney” until May 24th. This was noted and the historical graphs corrected starting with the June 8th update.

2012 Republican Delegate Count: Romney Steals a Delegate in Michigan

Chart from the Abulsme.com 2012 Republican Delegate Count Graphs page. When a candidate gets down to 0%, they have cinched the nomination. If they get up past 100%, they have been mathematically eliminated. Note that these numbers include estimates of the eventual results of multi-stage caucus processes which will be refined as the later stages occur.

So, everybody expected that 2 of Michigan’s delegates would be allocated proportionately, which meant that unless it was a complete blowout, you’d get one delegate each for the top two candidates statewide. But the Michigan GOP gave both delegates to Romney when they released the official results. They say that the proportional thing was a misunderstanding due to an error in an earlier memo and it was always going to be that way. The Santorum camp is calling shenanigans. More on this here and here. In any case, the result for the day is that Romney gains a delegate and Santorum loses one. It is just one delegate though, so the overall picture remains essentially the same.

@abulsme Updates from 2012-03-01 (UTC)

  • Reading – CDC Issues Warning About Nasal Washes (CBS 4 Denver) http://t.co/dKxvGU8M #
  • RT @FHQ: Crap. Is CNN already trying to report the Wyoming delegate allocation as proportional? Sigh. #
  • Reading – Conversation with my friend, Maile… (The Bloggess) http://t.co/2okCzT4U #
  • Reading – How Dolphins Say Hello (Elizabeth Norton) http://t.co/MDxFzOLu #
  • MT @ppppolls: Romney with a small lead on 1st night of our Washington poll. Represents big change from 2 wks ago, reflecting national shift #
  • Reading – Demography as Destiny: The GOP's Self-Inflicted Wound (James Fallows) http://t.co/DNnOp7Gq #
  • Reading – Warp Drives May Come With a Killer Downside (Jason Major) http://t.co/yJcg5aS9 #
  • Reading – In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012) (Larry Solov) http://t.co/AJPMRD7t #
  • Reading – Reports of the Republican Nominee's Doom Are Greatly Exaggerated (David A. Graham) http://t.co/dRRzGKYf #
  • Reading – Breitbart, RIP (Josh Marshall) http://t.co/mNalRMjB #
  • Reading – Third-Party Forecast: A Chance of Snowe? (Matt Negrin) http://t.co/nZxqIYw8 #

2012 Republican Delegate Count: Wyoming and Michigan Update

Chart from the Abulsme.com 2012 Republican Delegate Count Graphs page. When a candidate gets down to 0%, they have cinched the nomination. If they get up past 100%, they have been mathematically eliminated. Rather than the date on the x-axis, we show the “% of Delegates Already Allocated” as this better represents the progress through the race. Note that these numbers include estimates of the eventual results of multi-stage caucus processes which will be refined as the later stages occur.

So, first of all, that final congressional district in Michigan went for Santorum, so 2 more delegates for Santorum, making the final Michigan numbers 15 for Romney and 15 for Santorum, which was an exact match for my Scenario 2 in the post gaming out Arizona and Michigan.

Secondly, we have Wyoming. It is very important with Wyoming (as with similar caucuses previously) to point out that no national delegates were actually allocated in Wyoming yet. There was a straw poll, which doesn’t matter, and local delegates were selected for the next stage in the caucus process that will eventually select delegates to the national conventions. Ideally, each local delegate who was selected would be polled for their presidential preferences, and that would be used to predict results at the next level, etc. But that would be a ton of work, and nobody is doing that. Our source for these things, The Green Papers is doing the estimating by using the straw poll numbers for all candidates who got more than 5%. These estimates WILL change (perhaps significantly!) when the later caucus stages happen, but for now that is what we have. Green Papers estimates Wyoming as: Romney 10, Santorum 8, Paul 6, Gingrich 2.

And so when we pump this into the grinder and look at the “% of remaining needed to win” charts that I argue are the best way to see what is really happening… we find out… EVERYBODY LOSES. All four candidates in the race got delegates since my last update yesterday, but none of them got the delegates at the rate they would need to in order to get to 1144. Romney of course came closest. He got 10 out of 28 delegates today, or 35.7% of the delegates. But he needed to get 49.3% of the delegates (at least 14 of today’s 28) to actually be on pace to get to 1144.

Romney is still way ahead though. Right now he needs 49.5% of the remaining delegates to win. Santorum is in second needing 55.2% of the remaining delegates to win.

We are still fundamentally in a state where if Romney continues the way he has been, he will get to 1144, but very very late in the process… but with the possibility of the non-Romney’s blocking him still real. The non-Romney’s only have to do a little better than they have been to block Romney. One of the non-Romney’s actually catching up and winning gets to be an increasingly remote possibility as we move on though. Still not impossible. Just getting very hard. You would basically need consolidation around one non-Romney at the same time that Romney himself lost a significant amount of support.

@abulsme Updates from 2012-02-29 (UTC)

  • Reading – Olympia Snowe delivers stunning rebuke in decision to leave Senate (Gail Russell Chaddock) http://t.co/xzFWMZEh #
  • Reading – Ron Paul poll shocker: He beats Obama head-to-head (Peter Grier) http://t.co/ihvv5wpT #
  • RT @FHQ: And with one simple call, Romney wins the evening's delegate race. #azprimary #
  • RT @daveweigel: Mitt has now won 3 of the 4 states that have actually assigned delegates so far. (NH, AZ, FL) #MIprimary #
  • RT @dceiver: GENTLE REMINDER: The only thing worth knowing in MI is who wins what Congressional District. #
  • RT @EdEspinoza: Bad news for Romney: 24 primaries in March, 23 are proportional. Only 1 winner-take-all (Puerto Rico). http://t.co/lp1w3wps #
  • RT @daveweigel: BREAKING: Buddy Roemer in dead heat with Rick Perry for 6th place, 682-641 votes #MIprimary #
  • RT @CenteredPols: RT @daveweigel: BREAKING: In a couple of days Romney will lose a bunch of primaries to Santorum anyway. #MIprimary #
  • RT @SeanTrende: Romney could well win MI, but get fewer delegates. His vote is really heavily concentrated in the Detroit area. #
  • RT @FHQ: Delegates. Focus on the (CD) delegates. #miprimary #
  • RT @ebertchicago: Santorum asks, do we want the smart to lead us in this country? He implies the correct answer is "no." #
  • MT @DemConWatch: RT @FixAaron: Right now I've got Romney winning 7 congressional disricts, Santorum 3, 4 too close to call. #
  • RT @chucktodd: Romney won Mackinac County by 1 vote. 667 votes to Santorum's, wait for it, 666 votes. #
  • RT @chucktodd: Santorum leads in 9 of 14 MI CDs, but leads are thin in a few. Still POSSIBLE for Santorum to win majority of delegates in MI #
  • RT @wilw: BREAKING NEWS: Barack Obama wins Michigan GOP primary. #
  • @DemConWatch Flx? #
  • RT @DemConWatch: CNN: Romney 9 delegates, Santorum 7. AP: 5-5 GreenPapers : 8-8 #
  • RT @DemConWatch: CNN: Romney 9 delegates, Santorum 7. AP: 5-5 GreenPapers : 8-8, 538: 11-9, NBC 11(R)-13 (S) #
  • RT @DemConWatch: CNN: Romney 9 delegates, Santorum 7. AP: 5-5 GreenPapers : 15-13 538: 11-9, NBC 11(R)-13 (S) #
  • RT @DemConWatch: CNN: Romney 9 delegates, Santorum 7. AP: 5-5 GreenPapers : 15-13 538: 11-9, NBC 11(R)-13 (S), Fix: 15-7 #
  • MT @FHQ: Romney is only one who can get to 1144. Rest are playing losing game to keep him from getting there #
  • RT @daveweigel: Ron Paul has now won more votes in the 2012 primary than he won as the 1988 Libertarian candidate. #
  • MT @FHQ: Beat me to it, but yep. RT @slc_scott: In Wyoming, Romney won straw poll in 5 delegate-awarding counties, Santorum 4, and Paul 3 #
  • MT @FHQ: So because Romney is going to lose in places we expect him to lose next week, the odds of a contested election have increased? Huh? #

2012 Republican Delegate Count: Arizona and Michigan (Mostly)

Chart from the Abulsme.com 2012 Republican Delegate Count Graphs page. When a candidate gets down to 0%, they have cinched the nomination. If they get up past 100%, they have been mathematically eliminated.

The chart above is now the chart using the “% of delegates already allocated” as the x-axis rather than the date, because I think it more clearly shows what is actually going on at this point.

Romney picks up all 29 delegates from Arizona. As of this update the best estimates at The Green Papers gives Romney 15 delegates from Michigan, Santorum 13, and 2 delegates still too close to call. Those of you who read my Gaming Out Arizona and Michigan post will recognize Scenario 2, which at the time I said was the most likely result, and indeed, that is what happened. If the last outstanding congressional district ends up going for Santorum, then it will actually match Scenario 2 exactly. Regardless though, the general outlines of Scenario 2 are met, and I’ll just quote my analysis from that earlier post:

Romney is still the only winner here. It is clearly not as big a win [as if he had won nearly all of Michigan’s delegates through a more geographically even win], but Romney still makes his “% of remaining delegates needed to win” go DOWN, and go down to under 50%. Santorum, despite getting some delegates, is still in a worse position than when he started the night. Before he needed 54.1% of the remaining delegates to catch up and win the nomination, now he needs 54.9% [actually 55.0% pending disposition of those last 2 delegates]. Santorum does pull ahead of Gingrich though, and put himself clearly into second place. But the three non-Romney’s in this situation are still all heading upward (toward being mathematically eliminated), none of them has started to actually move down toward catching up and winning. Romney in this situation does improve a bit here, but also still isn’t breaking out downward yet. He is still hovering in the zone where his opponents (collectively) only have to do a little bit better to block him from getting the nomination. Note that they do have to do better though. Paul, Gingrich and Santorum could keep getting delegates at the same rate, and Romney would still get the nomination, it would just take awhile.

Attention now moves to first Wyoming and Washington (although they are not getting much attention) and then of course Super Tuesday. Super Tuesday is not as super as it was in 2008, but there are still a big chunk of delegates at stake, and after it is over, we should have a better view of what the rest of the race looks like, and specifically if Romney is able to break out and start closing on 1144, or if the non-Romney’s still have a real shot at blocking him from getting there. (Let alone actually catching up and winning, which is a much further stretch.)

@abulsme Updates from 2012-02-28 (UTC)

  • MT @mathowie: The theme of the Oscars this year is "Please for the love of god go to an actual theater like we did when we were kids" #
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: Michigan looking a little more tossup-y and less lean-Romney-ish than it did last night. #
  • RT @kkondik: Doing some looking at Super Tuesday — looks like Santorum will be hard-pressed to even tie Romney in delegates on March 6 #
  • RT @BuzzFeed: RIP 'Berenstain Bears' creator Jan Berenstain. She died Friday at age 88. #
  • Reading – Late Move in Santorum’s Favor (Josh Marshall) http://t.co/5QCIkvZX #
  • Watching – All Alone in the Night – Time-lapse footage of the Earth as seen from the ISS (Bitmeizer) http://t.co/lpPT4MY0 #
  • Reading – Leave our net alone (Jeff Jarvis) http://t.co/f6g4htyy #
  • Reading – Israel and Proxy Terrorism (Robert Wright) http://t.co/Xvvxro8Z #
  • Reading – Santorum Exposes The Real Republican Party (Andrew Sullivan) http://t.co/ZX8BWEDb #
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: Plausible that Ron Paul could win the 12th Congressional district in Michigan and pick up 2 delegates there. #
  • Split. RT @fivethirtyeight: I get 5 lean/likely Romney districts in Michigan, 4 lean/likely Santorums, and 5 toss-ups. http://t.co/ZuvPu96Z #
  • RT @ppppolls: Romney leads among Republicans in Michigan. It's Democrats putting Santorum over the top. We'll see if they really show up… #
  • RT @LarrySabato: Remember–if MI popular vote is tight, then Santorum prob wins more delegates than Romney because of allocation structure. #
  • RT @LarrySabato: A loss in MI delegate race will be embarrassing for Mitt. A loss in popular vote? Well, not spin-able, friends. A disaster. #
  • RT @FHQ: .@LarrySabato OH will be key on Super Tuesday regardless, but becomes near must win for Romney w/MI loss. #
  • Reading – U.S. Rule Set for Cameras at Cars’ Rear (Nick Bunkley) http://t.co/946UJmqj #