Once again, I don’t really think this should be an elected position, but since it is, two candidates:
And the official info packet thing here.
Hmmm. Once again not really a lot to go on. And this is the sort of position where there are not really “policy differences” to distinguish candidates. I generally have a natural bias against incumbents in most things, but in this sort of professional position that shouldn’t really be political anyway, I’ll go with the gut who has been doing it for 15 years and seems to be doing an OK job. So my vote goes to:
Scott Noble
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.